Musings from Crown Alumni

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Well, how to get a collected, direct sort of thing going here with my thoughts is more difficult than I originally imagined. Before I get into all this, though, I should like to say that you should thank me for taking time out of my tirelessly romantic Valentine's Day just to talk about unromantic things with everybody. If anything, I wanted to get one of those e-cards from the NBC website that have Steve Carrel and the other Office people on them. But I'm lazy, so instead, I'm just going to write a thoughtful blog. Right, like I can do that.
I'm trying not to do what Kyle always complained about while we were still in school, namely fearing doomsday scenerios simply due to most of us being absent from Crown. I want it clearly understood that I know things change and I don't expect Alma to be the same as when we were there. Also, most of what I am pointing out or questioning is simply conjecture. So now that I'm done undercutting my entire argumentative base, let's continue.
I feel that the "pan-eudemonia" of the Crown student body is at stake due to leadership styles and decisions. There, I said it. I think what we knew and felt from the administration during our years, the support and direction, is becoming a place where there's plenty of Christian-coated talk while the people that make Crown deep and real seem to be edged out. Like I said, conjecture. So, maybe it's just reading about Scott's resignation that finally made me really want to know what's happening. I don't think this is an overnight thing or that suddenly Crown students are now just vanilla-plain college students, ones with enough pocket change to pay the tab, but otherwise completely unrelated to what we were. I know the students are still there, having cheesy floor events, running to Holiday and complaining about Ratledge tests, but it's like they're being pointed down a different road than we were. How can I be more specific?
I'll admit, some of my concern stems from my own simple stories involving the past and present presidents. Some of you know, but maybe not everybody, that Rick was my pastor for seven years before he was my VP of Academics. He was Pastor Rick before he was Dr. Mann. Even after I was at Crown, we churched together for my four years. I'm just pointing this out so that you can follow my train of thought when I tell you a simple story. Oh, and unlike most of you, Dr. B and I had never been formally introduced, and I still don't think he knows my name, not that I need him to, but that weighs into the story (some of you have heard this, but I think it's worth retelling).
It was Christmas a year ago. I was at school for the Bach-Jahnke wedding, sitting in Miller's office chatting about who knows what. Dr. Mann ducked his head in first, telling Miller something, and then he noticed I was there. He said hi, and proceeded to leave. Dr. B was a few steps behind him, poked his head in the doorway, and after acknowledging Mr. Miller, he proceeded to ask me how grad school was going. He knew I was in grad school - he remembered somehow. And then he took the time to see what was happening with it, time out of his busy day to just be two people that can be some sort of connected. My pastor of eleven years, the father of two very close friends and in some ways my boss for several years of tutoring, didn't pause for that reconnecting moment that took place between me and Dr. B. I think that pause was very important, and I fear it might be those simple pauses that might be lost on the next generation. I know that the few times I had the pleasure of chatting with Scott, I felt that pause, that reality, that care, and without some major figures at school that once gave us that sense of interest and compassion, I don't know how the student body can feel at ease with all their issues, spiritual or academic or financial or relational, whatever. And so, the question is, who is there with students, pausing with them just so they can have the confidence and security necessary to continue with day-to-day struggles that could be glossed-over in an all-smiles, hustle and bustle atmosphere? Lynnea, I know this is your employer, these issues concern your superiors and your coworkers, ect. I don't want you to feel like any of my concerns can or should be a reflection of you. You know I feel the student body is in better shape even with you there part time. It's the upper-levels of the school, the rudder and not the hull that I'm pointing to as troublesome. Is this more specific? I really don't know what any of this is supposed to accomplish, but that's part of my point. Accomplishment, goals, tangible results aren't always something we need as humans. Sometimes we need to talk about how we feel (now I'm just sounding like an idiot). I'm done. But I definitely want to know what everybody else is thinking on these things. You all know I'm a glass-half-empty sort, seeing the worst stuff when it's not really bad at all. Take that into account when you guys tear me apart for thinking such wasteful things, or whatever. I really don't know how those of you that regularly finger-walk all over this thing think, but the few people I have talked to have made similar comments and points as I just did, only with specifics and first-hand knowledge. So, to finish up, alls I'm saying is sommin's not right. Or at least, that's how it feels... to me.... right now... I think. Really, done.

10 Comments:

  • Steve,
    Thank you for your post. I have heard the same ideas myself. I did not put much stock in them until our beloved Scott decided to leave. I liked your line about not always needing "accomplishments, goals, and tangible results." I think that these areas can be useful for measuring success, but are not the only components to success. It would seem that these are what most important to the new administration. That raises a fear that tangible things that made Crown great might be lost. Keep it in prayer my friends.

    By Blogger Our Family, at 8:11 AM  

  • I need to give this whole topic much more thought before formulating a thorough response, but my initial thought is this: Do you think that it is possible to increase the academic standards of Crown without losing "what we had" or the aspects of it that we consider to be successfull? Does it have to be one or the other? If so, as a teacher working to improve the academic rigor of the school, I find that very disheartening.

    By Blogger Lynnea, at 11:02 PM  

  • I'm not there, but I don't think Steve is suggesting that. I think he's pointing out that the personal aspect of the school is gone, something that we each valued very highly, I think. I had Dr Mann for an independent study class, and I thought, "What other school would I take a class with the VP and Academic Dean?" I don't even necessarily think that that should be the focus of the school; we pay for the education. But to lose it (and I'm not saying we are, but I think Steve is) would be tragic.

    Crown's mission statement: The mission of Crown College is to provide a biblically based education for Christian leadership in The Christian and Missionary Alliance, the church-at-large, and the world.

    Are they doing it?

    By Blogger bradley, at 11:09 PM  

  • My only comment is this. Whenever you leave a situation it is much easier to see the whole picture and not the smaller parts of it. I wonder how many people had this same conversation as we were having our "glory years" at Crown? It is hard for us to see the personal side of the school cause we aren't there to experience it. We see the administration and we assume what is happening.
    Dr. B brought SO MUCH personality to the school and the administration. He is a great guy! But because he was replaced by a man different than him, does not mean the school flipped a switch and is now unpersonal.
    I know from talking to a few students at the school that things are still going well.
    My question is are we really that selfish that we would think that because we are not there anymore that its not still a great place? I know that comment could get me in trouble, but its one I have been thinking about. Because I had those same thoughts.
    I have said too much.

    Folkestad

    By Blogger Folkestad, at 10:28 AM  

  • Chris,

    I agree with a lot htat you said. However, I think that there is still some concern that needs to be raised when men like Scott and Dr B. leave. I don't think we should assumed that the absence of such men means damnation for Crown, but if not replaced could lead in a direction that misses the intangible family atmoshpere that makes us continue to post years after we have left school. This is obviously not happened as of yet, but the fear is Crown could be headed down a slippery slope. Does this make any sense?

    By Blogger Our Family, at 11:22 AM  

  • It makes sense, but last time I checked, God still had his hand on Crown and will probably oversee the personnel vacancies that have been and still need tob be filled.
    (Gabe, Kate and I wish you were coming to Cali with us next month!)

    Folkestad

    By Blogger Folkestad, at 4:21 PM  

  • Brad wishes you were coming to Cali too!!

    Folkestad, I don't think you can just appeal to God's sovereignty and say that everything has to work out because God's got his hand on Crown. I'm sure he does, but that doesn't stop people there from getting drunk or looking at porn, nor will it stop the school from going down the wrong path.

    By Blogger bradley, at 4:59 PM  

  • This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    By Blogger bradley, at 4:59 PM  

  • IT may not stop the school from going the wrong way, but I do believe it helps it continue down the right path.
    I am not saying that Hubka's comments are not warrented, I have the same concerns about Crown. It is a huge part of who I am, and the source of some of my closest friendships. I want nothing but the best for the college's future.
    I do however, believe that God's hand is guiding the school. Look at how many of us felt after the student development office was wiped out. Looking back on it now, I believe that was a good move for the college. It wasn't a popular move, but it brought new and talented people to our college, and I believe it added, not subtracted to the college as a whole.
    I am not just leaving the future of crown up to God and leaving it at that... But I do believe that He continues to guide the school.

    Folkestad

    By Blogger Folkestad, at 6:01 PM  

  • I know that I don't post on this blog very much, but this post hit me at home. I have been thinking a lot about the situation at Crown, and to be honest, at first it bothered me a lot. When I applied for colleges, I was not looking for the place where I would get the best academic education. If that was the case, I never would have even given Crown a chance. I was drawn to Crown for the personality of the school. I have also experienced going to another Christian college, Northwestern. The experience for me was night and day, because I was looking for a place of openess and that was beyond academics. I am not saying that Northwestern is completely focused on the academics, but it is very different than Crown. Another trigger for these thoughts about Crown is that several of my high schoolers are looking into Crown. It deeply saddens me that they will never have the opportunity to meet Dr. B or to hear Scott's heart in chapel. I must say though, that I have learned to trust that the Board is truly seeking out God's heart for the school and they believe that this is direction in which His finger is pointing. It is hard for me to imagine Crown being anything different from what I experienced. But I also feel that the leadership at Crown is doing what they believe God's telling them. I still have reservations because I am not there and do not see daily what is going on, but I hope and pray that we would feel a sense of peace that God is still working at Crown even though two men that we all respect and love are no longer present in the situation.

    By Blogger Bekah, at 2:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home